Free Hosting : Credit & Debt : Free Web Hosting : Best Credit Cards



Zusammengetragenes#

## Archimedes  Hebel Fliehkraft
## FE  Michel Meyer u.A.
## Steve Mark
##Rotverter
##Magnetocaloric
--------------------------------## Archimedes

..Archimede suggested,in a simple manner,the first step,a "fifty per cent" design of a gravity machine.He,before anybody,proved the motion of a lever and more...Let's read again,his Assumption 1:"Equal weights,at equal distances from the fulcrum,balance(*).Equal weights,at unequal distances from the fulcrum,do not balance,but the weight at the greater distance will tilt its end of the lever ,down"(**).So,about the lever,we have,in a concise shape,(*)=a static problem of a weighting machine,and (**)=an obsevation about dynamics,that can be a suggestion for a tilt,topple,overturn of this one.It helps us,to imagine in the most facile manner,the picturing of the first stroke of a possible gravity machine.This can be the first step.Who make the next?All the Bests!/Alex . Archimede schlug, in einer einfachen Weise, den ersten Schritt, ein " vor; percent" fünfzig; Design einer Schwerkraftmaschine. Er, vor jedem, prüfte die Bewegung eines Hebels und mehr… Let' s las wieder, seine Annahme 1: " Gleiche Gewichte, in gleichen Abständen vom Drehpunkt, Balance (*). Gleiche Gewichte, in ungleichen Abständen vom Drehpunkt, gleichen nicht aus, aber das Gewicht in dem grösseren Abstand kippt sein Ende des Hebels, down" (**). So über den Hebel, haben wir, in einer kurzen Form, (*) =a Statikaufladung-Problem einer belastenden Maschine, und (**) stürzen =an obsevation über Dynamik, die ein Vorschlag für eine Neigung sein kann, Overturn von diesem. Es hilft uns, uns in der leichtesten Weise, das Darstellen vorzustellen des ersten Anschlags einer möglichen Schwerkraftmaschine. Dieser kann der erste Schritt sein. Wer bilden das folgende? Alles Bests! /Alex
------------------------------------------Franz Patente Meyer usw http://v3.espacenet.com/origdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=FR2385255&F=0&QPN=FR2385255 http://v3.espacenet.com/origdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=FR2680613&F=0&QPN=FR2680613 pdf abgelegt azillo.dina http://v3.espacenet.com/origdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=CZ9603387&F=0&RPN=CZ284333&DOC=caab52f9a04700bf7a34eea8712ed5a54c
------------------------------------------Steve Mark aus OU Grumpy Quote from: Grumpy on Today at 04:03:20 AM Pulses. Fast rise, short duration, fast fall. Absolutely no reverse curent. Grumpy has been cutting through the disinfo on this forum and stored some great information that was previously deleted. Below is an exchange between TAO and Lindsay Mannix where Steve Marks confirms that he was on the right track. >(from TAO) So, based on those things, lets look at the Mark device. Lets say Steven put one big stout cable around or in the rings,and all around these he had many many windings. Now, if Steven put into that stout cable a current and before the current could get to the end of the wire, he stopped it's flow abruptly, then perpendicular radiations (the KICKS), the same Tesla observed, would appear and spread from this stout cable, this would cause Tesla'a copper charging effect, which would hit all the other wires in Steven's coils. Now, if Steven wired the coils right and stopped the discharge of the current through the coils he would be able to extract a lot of extra energy from the tap points on the coils. This is basically how Tesla's magnifying transmitter works. Capacitors discharged ABRUPTLY into a wire, then the current flow is stopped ABRUPTLY before the current makes it to the end of the wire, and this KICK comes out of the wires perpendicularly. This KICK would then charge copper with electrons(hot electricity) or their opposites(cold electricity). It just depends on how you setup the device. So, I would say that Steven's KICKS have a direct relationship to Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, its REAL operation.< (FROM SM) So Lindsay, this guy definitely has the secret. I do not know if he will be able to duplicate power generation, but he does have the secret. Do you think he knows it? The only part he doesn't have any idea about is that by starting the oscillation you cause the current to flow in the collector which causes the magnification of the process within the collector which will ultimately produce the greater voltage and power in usable amounts during operation.
------------------------------ Anführungsstrich von: Grumpy an heute bei 04:03: 20 MORGENS Impulse. Steile, kurze Dauer, fastet Fall. Absolut keine Rückseite curent. Grumpy hat durch das disinfo auf diesem Forum geschnitten und etwas große Informationen speicherte, die vorher gelöscht wurden. Unter ist ein Austausch zwischen TAO und Lindsay Mannix, in dem Steve Markierungen bestätigt, daß er auf der rechten Schiene war. > (von TAO) so gegründet auf jenen Sachen, läßt Blick an der Markierung Vorrichtung. Läßt Sagen Steven ein grosses stout Kabel um oder in die Ringe einsetzen, und ganz um diese hatte er viele viele Wicklungen. Jetzt wenn Steven, der in dieses stout Kabel ein Strom und gesetzt wurde bevor der Strom könnte an das Ende der Leitung gelangen, stoppte er sie ist Fluß unerwartet, dann Senkrechtstrahlungen (die STÖSSE), das gleiche beobachtete Tesla, würde erscheinen und von diesem stout Kabel, dieses zu verbreiten würde aufladeneffekt des Tesla'a Kupfers verursachen, der alle anderen Leitungen in den Spulen Stevens schlagen würde. Jetzt wenn Steven die Spulen nach rechts verdrahtete und die Entladung des Stromes durch die Spulen stoppte, wurde er extrahiert eine Menge Extraenergie von den Hahnpunkten auf den Spulen. Dieses ist im Allgemeinen, wie Teslas Vergrößerungsübermittler arbeitet. Die Kondensatoren, die UNERWARTET in eine Leitung, dann der gegenwärtige Fluß entladen werden, wird UNERWARTET gestoppt, bevor der Strom ihn zum Ende der Leitung bildet, und dieser STOSS kommt aus die Leitungen senkrecht heraus. Dieser STOSS würde dann Kupfer mit Elektronen (heiße Elektrizität) oder ihren Entgegengesetzten aufladen (kalte Elektrizität). Sie hängt gerade davon ab, wie du die Vorrichtung gründest. So würde ich, daß STÖSSE Stevens ein direktes Verhältnis zu Teslas Vergrößerungsübermittler haben, sein REALES operation.< sagen (VON Inspektion) so hat Lindsay, dieser Kerl definitiv das Geheimnis. Ich weiß nicht, wenn er kopiert Stromerzeugung wird, aber er das Geheimnis hat. Denkst du ihn kennst es? Das einzige Teil, das er keine Idee hat, ist ungefähr das, indem es die Pendelbewegung beginnt du den Strom veranlassst, in den Kollektor zu fließen, der die lineare Wiedergabe des Prozesses innerhalb des Kollektors verursacht, der schließlich die grössere Spannung und die Energie in den verwendbaren Mengen während des Betriebes produziert. ---------------- Steve Mark is a US citizen. He was made an offer he couldn't refuse. You are lucky he provided even a hint. Those who wish to covet this technology do not care about billions, patents, or rights. There are so many coil designs that will work that they can not be protected. The drive circuit is too simple to protect. Don't believe the hype. SM never stated that the coil arrangements in the videos were the best arrangements... The technology involved is larger than one person and the group seeking the solution. Do not give up. Pulses. Fast rise, short duration, fast fall. Absolutely no reverse curent.

----------------------------------------- Rotoverter http://peswiki.com/index.php/Rotoverter
googlevideo, 40minutes: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6905677911913482159
radiant /zpe manual: http://rootof.info/distro/RE-OU-v6_1.pdf radiant energie + zpe PDF.MANUAL
rotoverter page on peswiki http://peswiki.com/index.php/Rotoverter rotoverter page on panacea: http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/RotoVerter.htm Study Electronic Index: Study Basic Circuits Index Chapter 1: BASIC AC THEORY Chapter 2: COMPLEX NUMBERS Chapter 3: REACTANCE AND IMPEDANCE -- INDUCTIVE Chapter 4: REACTANCE AND IMPEDANCE -- CAPACITIVE Chapter 5: REACTANCE AND IMPEDANCE -- R, L, AND C Chapter 6: RESONANCE Chapter 7: MIXED-FREQUENCY AC SIGNALS Chapter 8: FILTERS Chapter 9: TRANSFORMERS Chapter 10: POLYPHASE AC CIRCUITS Chapter 11: POWER FACTOR Chapter 12: AC METERING CIRCUITS Chapter 13: AC MOTORS Chapter 14: TRANSMISSION LINES BIBLIOGRAPHY Appendix 1: ABOUT THIS BOOK Appendix 2: CONTRIBUTOR LIST Appendix 3: DESIGN SCIENCE LICENSE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/serres.html Resonance http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/standw.html Stehwellen http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/index.html http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/AC_6.html Resonance http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/1mra.htm http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/2mra.htm ------------------------------------------------- Magnetcaloric freie energie ab einer gewissen Menge Pumpenergie +++ Text hierzu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MEMM From EMWiki Jump to: navigation, search Contents [hide] 1 Intro 2 My scientific method 3 Where the energy comes from 4 Why Permeability is a factor in Potential "Free Energy" 5 First Released Details 6 Secrets for Method #1 7 Secrets for Method #2 8 More credence to MCE theory 9 Comments on the MEG 10 Definitions 11 Further comments 12 How to measure MCE 13 Relevant Posts at overunity.com --------------------------------
Intro MEMM - Magnetocaloric Energy Mover Machine
Over 15 million joules of energy is exchanged in one second (15 megawatts) in one cubic inch of nanocrystalline and amorphous magnetic material by simply oscillating the core at 100 KHz per Tesla. That is MCE-- the magnetocaloric effect. The amount of power required to cause an exchange of 15 megawatts in such a core is but a fraction of one watt.
Normally the core absorbs nearly 100% of MCE energy. Because of recent major breakthroughs compact solid-state devices can generate kilowatts of unlimited "free energy" in the form of electricity. Below contains more than sufficient information for deep thinking individuals to create such a device. Two detailed methods of extracting free MCE energy are explained in addition to precise step-by-step processes as to what's happening within magnetic material on the atomic scale. For now we know the MCE energy exists and is accessible. The last goal remains of closing the loop-- producing the exact designs of a relatively inexpensive machine that will run by itself without the aid of any power source while generating significant "free energy."
Note
This project and research requires no funding or payments of any kind. No payment is requested nor has any ever been accepted for this project and research. I use my personal equipment and my money to fund this researcher.
Note, click here to segment this document if this page does not fully load.
My scientific method Modern science relies on the written mathematics as a scientific tool. I firmly believe the future of science will drastically change over the following decades. The written mathematical equations will fade over time, being replaced by complex computer software algorithms, functions, and simulations. I have developed my own scientific method, which is foreign to modern science. Such a method revolves around complex computer algorithms, functions, and simulations, detailing meticulous step-by-step processes.
Where the energy comes from The energy comes from ambient temperature. MEMM is a solid-state concept that generates electricity. MEMM is based on MCE, the Magnetocaloric effect, a very well known effect discovered in 1881 by by E. Warburg. Magnetic material heats up when a field is applied and cools down when the field is removed. Finemet, a nanocrystalline and amorphous magnetic material, for example changes by 1 Kelvin per Tesla. Alloys of gadolinium can change over 4 K/T. The cooling effect of MCE has been used as a source of deep freezing. When a field is applied to magnetic material the electron spins flip in alignment with the net field. To understand this lets consider an example on a larger scale. Consider to PM's (permanent magnets) that are facing each other, but opposing. The fields cancel. Now allow the PM's to freely rotate and you will see they may violently snap in alignment. That energy, on a subatomic scale is where MCE energy comes from. It is the electrons flipping in alignment in the avalanches. The amount of energy that comes from the batteries in the circuit is infinitesimal in comparison to the MCE energy.
So we have electrons in alignment with the net magnetic field. It requires energy to force the electron spins to break that alignment. If the magnetic material is at absolute 0 Kelvin and we completely remove the applied magnetic field the electrons would remain aligned. What actually breaks the alignments is ambient temperature-- the vibrating atoms. So the vibrating atoms force the electrons to not align thereby removing energy from the atoms, which is why the magnetic material cools down when the applied field is removed.
In a nutshell ... You apply a magnetic field, the material heats up. You pause for a while to allow the material to cool down due to heat conduction. So the material is now at room temperature. You remove the applied field and the material almost instantly cools below room temperature.
Very few people, even scientists, realize just how much energy is exchanged during each quarter cycle in magnetic materials. For example, consider an iron toroid with copper windings. The effective permeability of a pure iron toroid is considerably high and requires a small amount of current. The current in our example is a sine wave. Due to the permeability of iron the field fluctuates in our example between 1 and -1 Tesla's. The Magnetocaloric effect for iron is 2 K per Tesla. In other words, when the field increases by one Tesla the material heats up 2 K. When the field is removed the material cools down by 2 K. This has been used as an efficient powerful means of deep freezing. Back to our example, the signal oscillates at 100 KHz. So when the field goes from 0 to 1 T the material heats up 2 K. When the field falls from 1 to 0 T the material cools down. When the field goes from 0 to -1 T the material heats up. When the field goes from -1 to 0 T the material cools down. We will refer to each of these steps as one energy exchange; i.e., an exchange of energy. So there are four energy exchanges per sine wave. There are 100 thousand sine wave cycles per second. So there are 4 * 100000 = 400000 energy exchanges per second. The specific heat capacity of Iron is 25.10 J/(mole*K). J = Joules and K = Kelvin. Lets say our toroid is one cubic inch (16.39 cc). The molar volume of iron is 7.09 cc/Mole. So 16.39 cc / 7.09 cc/mole is 2.312 moles. So 2.312 moles * 2 K * 25.10 J/(mole*K) is 116.1 Joules of energy per energy exchange. So at 400000 energy exchanges per second we get 116.1 J * 400000 x/s where x is energy exchange, which is 46.44e+6 J/s. J = watts * seconds, so 46.44e+6 J/s is 46.44 megawatts!
46.44 million watts of energy exchange per second occurring within one cubic inch of iron is astonishing, but very real! If we calculate the amount of energy exchanges in Gadolinium alloy we arrive at almost the same value of 48.79 megawatts. The magnetocaloric effect for Gadolinium is 4 K/T
Note that such high MCE in iron does not occur until higher temperatures. Although nanocrystalline and amorphous materials have high MCE (relatively speaking) at room temperature and would require extremely small amount of power as a catalyst to generate megawatts of MCE energy.
MCE is very complex and caused by many dozens of effects. The magnetostriction in materials such as Finemet is so small that it is presently immeasurable. Therefore magnetostriction plays no appreciable role in MCE in such nanocrystalline materials. A great deal of magnetic materials on the other hand has appreciable magnetostriction, and therefore plays an appreciable role in MCE.
Why Permeability is a factor in Potential "Free Energy"
The objective is to capture potential magnetic energy. An example of potential magnetic energy is two repelling face-to-face magnetic moments. The magnetic moments want to rotate so they magnetically align. That is potential magnetic energy. We know MCE is greatest near Curie temperature. Near Curie temperature the magnetic moments are pointing in random directions, and thus provided maximum natural potential magnetic energy. Unfortunately most magnetic materials possess very low MCE at room temperature because the magnetic moments are tightly bonded in alignment (e.g., forming a four wall domain pattern). Therefore, most (not all due to Bloch walls) of the magnetic material is saturated with no applied field. Thus it requires a stronger applied field to force the magnetic moments in the direction of the applied field; e.g., a saturated toroid core. Magnetic materials with higher permeability require less applied field. This suggests materials with higher permeability have less tightly bonded magnetic moments. Therefore, ambient temperature causes more randomization (less aligned moments), which suggests higher permeability materials have higher potential magnetic energy. IOW, material with higher permeability releases more energy when changing from no applied field to saturation as compared to material with lower permeability. This theory seems to hold true so far.
In a nutshell, higher permeability usually equates to higher potential magnetic energy. Although, this seems to be the typical rule, it's not a guarantee since MCE is complex and caused by many effects. First Released Details
Below are the two methods described in detail how to extract "free energy" from the MCE and what occurs on the atomic scale.

First, a few prerequisites and definitions. PM - short for Permanent Magnet.

Magnetic materials - Most magnetic materials are either ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic. They both generate magnetic fields, but ferromagnetic is stronger than ferrimagnetic. Ferrites are made with ferrimagnetic material. Pure iron, cobalt, nickel, etc. are ferromagnetic.
Electron orbital - The electrons are not particles, but really wave-particles. Even so, a lot of electrons do indeed have an equivalent orbital motion around the atoms nucleus. Simply stated, some electrons orbit the atom. Basically you can imagine this electron orbital as a coil of current.
Intrinsic electron spin - I'll abbreviate this as IES. If we zoom in a look at the electron we'll note there is an equivalent vortex of current. Basically speaking you can imagine the electron as a small coil with current. More precisely this imaginary current is spread out like a vortex. Essentially, IES is similar to the electron orbital except the IES is far smaller and more intense.
Magnetic field caused by all ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic materials - The magnetic field caused by these materials mostly come from the IES, not electron orbital. I've read values of 80% IES.
Magnetic moment - This is a field caused by either IES or the electron orbital. If you have seen drawings of the Earths magnetic field then you know what the magnetic moment field looks like. See the below image.
MCE - This is the Magnetocaloric effect.
Eddy current - Please see the following web page -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current
Electron flip - This is as described, the electron rotating 180 degrees and flipping. A great deal QM (Quantum Mechanic) physicists are under the impression the single electron does not rotate, but simply flips in an instant, in zero seconds. This is a false interpretation of QM. Experiments conducted by companies such as IBM have shown that the electron not only forces the entire atom to rotate, but it also forces the atom to precess as it flips / rotates. The actual electrons flip rate has been measured and it's typically a few nanoseconds, but can be significantly slower in electrically conductive magnetic materials.
Avalanches - This is an effect where a great deal of electrons flip. It is an avalanche effect where one electron will trigger another and so on until the avalanche dies out.
Applied field - This is simply a magnetic field that is applied to the magnetic material. This applied field can come from current in a coil or from PM's.
Magnetic energy - this is in reference to the energy associated with electron flips.
There are basically two main methods of extracting MCE energy. -->
Method #1 --- Using the Eddy currents as a tool
This is the method Naudin used in both of his designs. This method will not work on magnetic cores unless the material contains electrically conducive magnetic material. For example, powdered MnZn should work to some decree given the MnZn is electrically conductive. Pure iron or silicon iron cores should work to some degree.
Lets start from the beginning and with a very simple design. For simplicity lets use a design that does not have any PM's (Permanent Magnets) because PM designs are more complex. We have a core with two coils-- coil #1 and #2. This design therefore requires a certain minimum amount of current running through the coil to make up for the lack of PM. Note that coil #2 is only for collecting energy. Our core is a toroid.
So current is flowing through the coil #1. The net magnetic field within the core is at level A. Now we want to increase coil #1's current as rapidly as possible. So coil #1 has increasing current and coil #2 is completely off. What happens is the IES's (Intrinsic Electron Spins) flip in avalanches. These avalanches are very slow because our magnetic core is electrically conductive. So there are avalanches igniting here and there. These avalanches cause Eddy currents, since our magnetic material is electrically conductive. So basically a great deal of the energy associated with the IES flip is given to the Eddy current. We see within magnetic material there's a storm brewing as the applied field increases. As the applied field increases there are millions of nano size avalanches and Eddy currents. The avalanches generate energy, which Eddy currents collect. The Eddy currents have an RL decay period, once they reach peak, meaning the Eddy currents decay at a changing rate, simply stated.
At this moment our applied field is increasing, there are avalanches and Eddy currents. At the precise moment, and time is crucial, our coil #1 suddenly turns off and coil #2 turns on. There are a lot avalanches in the process of flipping, thereby generating Eddy currents. We now have no current through coil #1. Note that even though there's no current in the coil there still will be avalanches completing their flip, and hence there will be Eddy currents. For simplicity coil #2 is connect to a resistor. So the resistor across coil #2 collects the energy from the Eddy currents and avalanches.
Eventually the net magnetic field in the core will fall back to level A, as mentioned above, and the process repeats.

Method #2 --- The High Speed method
I'll document this method at a later time. Essentially this method requires non-electrical magnetic core such as magnetite. This method could possibly generate more power, but requires extraordinarily high performing parts that can switch in roughly a nanosecond or faster while allowing either high current or high breakdown voltages. As in method #1, the core is always partially magnetized.
This method does not rely on the micro eddy currents. Rather, the coils current must quickly rise faster than a fraction of one avalanche flip. Since the core is non-electrically conductive the avalanche flips will typically occur in a few nanoseconds. It's the job of the coil to generate one coherent simultaneous avalanche pulse. When the magnetic moment flipping process occurring in the avalanches reaches a certain degree of rotation (roughly 90 degrees rotation) then it is time to collect the avalanche EMP energy. Remember, just as in method #1, the core starts at level A net magnetic field. So the core is partially magnetized from the start. It is this strong net magnetic field that provides so much energy when the magnetic moments flip. The magnetic field caused by the coil is but a fraction of the field caused by the magnetic material.
Secrets for Method #1
Core must be electrically conductive
Use materials with highest permeability at operating temperatures-- amorphous and nanocrystalline cores. High saturation material. Magnetic core materials with higher saturation levels equates to higher potential magnetic energy. Using a permanent magnetic reverses the process, thus making it easier to collect the energy. Frequency is critical in generating the most effective maximum Magnetic Momentum pulse. At any given time there are X amount of avalanches that have reached the stage of no return. In other words the avalanches will complete their flip even if you instantly drop the applied field to zero. This is what I term Magnetic Momentum. There will be the perfect frequency that generates the best Magnetic Momentum pulse. See Further comments for details on Magnetic Momentum. Materials with the lowest Saturation Magnetostriction.
Materials capable of higher frequencies.

Secrets for Method #2
Core must be non-electrically conductive
Use materials with highest permeability at operating temperatures-- amorphous and nanocrystalline cores. The thinner the core the better! Your goal is to prevent the core from absorbing the MCE radiation. Presently I am pondering upon a design that uses long thin magnetic electrically conductive wires. The thin wire would be both the core and coil. High saturation material. Magnetic core materials with higher saturation levels equates to higher potential magnetic energy. Nearly saturating the core. A fully saturated core prevents the intrinsic electron spins from absorbing the MCE energy. Of course a fully saturated core is useless, but no realistic coil can fully saturate magnetic material. Using a permanent magnetic reverses the process, thus making it easier to collect the energy. The field from your coil will oppose the PM's field. So you slowly increase your coil current to decrease the cores net applied field and then you want to drop the current or reverse the current as quickly as possible (high di/dt). High di/dt causes a higher percentage of simultaneous magnetic moment flips, which in turn greatly reduces the cores ability to absorb MCE energy, which allows more of the energy to escape the core. In short, ultra high di/dt lowers the effective permeability, which in turn prevents the core from absorbing a great deal of the MCE energy, which your circuit can then properly absorb. If the core material has low electrical resistivity then the Eddy currents will absorb the radiating energy and then with precise timing you can rob a certain percentage of the Eddy currents energy. Materials with the lowest Saturation Magnetostriction.
Materials capable of higher frequencies.

A few people believe the MEG generated dangerous ultrasonics. Please read the following post to understand why such rumors are completely false: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1489.msg11976.html#msg11976

More credence to MCE theory
For months MCE theory has been predicting nanocrystalline magnetic materials exhibit very high MCE. The searching paid off when discovering the following abstract. MCE theory predicts domain size is a major factor in MCE energy exchange. Two scientists, Skorvánek and Kovác, have confirmed that nanocrystalline magnetic materials do in fact exhibit very high MCE. Below is a quote of Skorvánek and Kovác abstract on detailed study of amorphous and nanocrystalline material ->
Abstract:
We have studied the temperature dependence of the magnetocaloric effect in series of amorphous and nanocrystalline Fe80.5Nb7B12.5 melt-spun ribbons. The maximum entropy change DgrSm asymp 0.72 J/kgK is found at the Curie temperature of the amorphous material, T C(am) asymp 363 K, upon a 0.7 T magnetic field change. This DgrSm value is a factor of four less than that of gadolinium, the prototypical high-temperature magnetocaloric material, but it compares favorably with other amorphous Fe-based alloys. The progressive nanocrystallization of amorphous ribbons results in a decrease of magnetic entropy change and at the same time the DgrSm peak becomes broadened.
Skorvánek and Kovác have confirmed Finemet, a nanocrystalline and amorphous magnetic material, exhibits one fourth MCE as the best Gd alloys. That is extraordinary news. My experiments have revealed MCE is very low for common ferrites and iron alloy cores at room temperature. It is known that nanocrystalline cores have nano size domains. Ferrite and Iron alloy domains are typically thousands of times larger.
The particular amorphous and nanocrystalline material used by Skorvánek and Kovác, Finemet, resulted in 0.72 J/Kg/K with a 0.7 T field change, which is 0.72 J/Kg/K * 1.0 T / 0.7 T = 1.0 J/Kg/K. At room temperature, 295 K, we arrive at the following energy ->
First we need to find the weight. I have been using the example of one cubic inch of material. The weight of one cubic inch of this material is roughly 0.13 Kg. In our examples we've used 100 KHz. So at 100000 cycles per second there are 400000 energy exchanges; 4 energy exchanges per sine wave. This material exchanges the following amount of energy per Tesla at 100 KHz ->
1.0 J/(KgK) * 0.13 Kg * 295 K * 400000 = 15.3E+6 J in one second, which equates to 15.3 megawatts. Given the same conditions as described above we will note that Gd alloys can exhibit 50 megawatts. We will note that 15 megawatts is close to one fourth of 50 megawatts, as described in the above quoted abstract.
Amorphous and nanocrystalline materials are extremely efficient at 100 KHz. At 1 MHz the energy exchanges are 150 megawatts. In other words, 150 megawatts of energy is being radiated and absorbed within 1 small cubic inch of magnetic material! The permeability of these materials are extremely high. I just requested a sample of such material that has a permeability of 1,000,000. Such material requires extraordinarily minute amount of Amp*Turns to impose a 1 T field within the core. Such a 100 KHz signal would require a fraction of a watt. Yet that fraction of a watt is the catalyst for 15 megawatts or power!
Some may believe MCE is caused by magnetostriction, but there are various reasons why such a theory is incorrect. One being that most nanocrystalline and amorphous materials have nearly zero magnetostriction. Finemet for example has no detectable magnetostriction.
Comments on the MEG According to Naudin and others the MEG generates "free energy," but still has not been able to close the loop. After looking at Naudin's scope pictures I noticed he is making several errors in interpreting his scopes output energy, but these errors are mostly in the silicon iron version. Most of the scope pics on his Metglas version are very close and indeed "free energy." The problem in replicating the MEG is (if my theory is correct) in the UHF (ultra high frequencies). You can build 100 of Naudin's machines, which includes wrapping a large coil with over 2000 windings, and end up with 100 different machines. As you know, the capacitances involved in the windings can differ. Depending on the core material the magnetocaloric frequencies could typically be in the hundreds of MHz. The wrong impedance can kill such a device at UHF frequencies. Naudin used a modified carbon resister, which was created by high voltage I believe. That by self may have some type of small high-frequency unidirectional characteristics. But replace that 100K custom carbon resister with a MOSFET and you'll most likely have a short at 500 MHz. The load is critical in absorbing the UHF energy. Also if the magnetic material does not have heat syncs and proper air flow then the material can go in temperature shock, which would prevent the machine from working too long.
Also there are other issues that come along with ultra high permeable materials when considering the magnetocaloric energies. For example when studying wave mechanics we see that such materials prevent nearly all the waves from escaping the core. This is akin to a wave traversing in ultra high reflective index and trying to enter a low reflective index material. The wave simply reflects. In such cases wires that are very close to the core are effective in absorbing the energy. Perhaps magnetic wire could help improve this issue.
So the above issues may have prevented Naudin from closing the loop. One thing seems for certain, his scope shots seem clear, showing enough information to conclude his Metglas device (not sure about the iron version) was generating "free energy."
Numerous people have been asking how to tap into this magnetocaloric energy. I have never posted this secret, but it's perhaps time to at least post part of this bit of information. The answer is fourfold:
the MEMM is a completely solid-state device. The only moving part, that's not actually required, is a fan or some type of heat conducting fins, but this would only be require for high output devices. The output would be electricity.
------------------- http://overunity.com/stevenmark/TPU.rar WICHTIG -----------------------------------
Definitions Applied field - This is simply a magnetic field that is applied to the magnetic material. This applied field can come from current in a coil or from PM's. Avalanches - This is an effect where a great deal of electrons flip. It is an avalanche effect where one electron will trigger another and so on until the avalanche dies out. Eddy current - Please see the following web page -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current Electron flip - This is as described, the electron rotating 180 degrees and flipping. A great deal QM (Quantum Mechanic) physicists are under the impression the single electron does not rotate, but simply flips in an instant, in zero seconds. This is a false interpretation of QM. Experiments conducted by companies such as IBM have shown that the electron not only forces the entire atom to rotate, but it also forces the atom to precess as it flips / rotates. The actual electrons flip rate has been measured and it's typically a few nanoseconds, but can be significantly slower in electrically conductive magnetic materials. Electron orbital - The electrons are not particles, but really wave-particles. Even so, a lot of electrons do indeed have an equivalent orbital motion around the atoms nucleus. Simply stated, some electrons orbit the atom. Basically you can imagine this electron orbital as a coil of current. Intrinsic electron spin - I'll abbreviate this as IES. If we zoom in a look at the electron we'll note there is an equivalent vortex of current. Basically speaking you can imagine the electron as a small coil with current. More precisely this imaginary current is spread out like a vortex. Essentially, IES is similar to the electron orbital except the IES is far smaller and more intense. Magnetic energy - this is in reference to the energy associated with electron flips. Magnetic field caused by all ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic materials - The magnetic field caused by these materials mostly come from the IES, not electron orbital. I've read values of 80% IES. Magnetic materials - Most magnetic materials are either ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic. They both generate magnetic fields, but ferromagnetic is stronger than ferrimagnetic. Ferrites are made with ferrimagnetic material. Pure iron, cobalt, nickel, etc. are ferromagnetic. Magnetic moment - This is a field caused by either IES or the electron orbital. If you have seen drawings of the Earths magnetic field then you know what the magnetic moment field looks like. See the below image.
MCE - This is the Magnetocaloric effect. PM - short for Permanent Magnet.
Further comments I think the following may help those interested in the MEG, related devices, and further research. The MEG pulse timing is vitally important! The amount of load resistance relative to number of secondary turns is vitally important. It would help if the load resistor appropriately changed during the received pulsed, hence it might be worth duplicating Naudin's conditioned resistors. Just make sure you use a common small R (as Naudin did) as a way of measuring the current. IMHO the input power to core is important. That is a lot of combinations. If you change the R 40 times, adjust for 40 different frequencies, and then 40 different input voltages that's 40 * 40 * 40 = 64000 combinations. Finding the exact correct situation for your particular setup could be akin to finding a gold mine, but well worth it. First, we know avalanche radiation exists. I prefer to call it "avalanche radiation" over Barkhausen because it's more descriptive and there's a little controversy about Barkhausen, but that's another subject. Point being, we know about the avalanches. We know it is typically UHF radiation for non-electrical cores and considerably lower for conductive cores such as iron. The amount of such radiation that escapes the core is very small. The reason it is small is because the avalanche occurs completely incased within the core and we know the fields have a closed loop, a magnetic short if you will. This easily demonstrated with FEMM. Also we may study induction simulations to learn that core radiation leakage is relative to the materials permeability. Now to the point. At any given time while we are pulsing a core there are X amount of avalanches occurring that are unstoppable; i.e., if we remove the applied field the avalanches would complete. I refer to this as "Magnetic Momentum" (that's momentum, not moment), and not to be confused with Magnetic Viscosity. The amount of magnetic momentum varies with material. There are a lot of factors, but the main factors are the materials MCE and its electrical conductivity. I predict that nanocrystalline materials such as Metglas and Finemet have high magnetic momentum. ---
I would like to differentiate the different between MCE energy and common induction. Envision thousands of tiny PM's (permanent magnets) on swivels that forms one big toroid. There is wire that wraps this big toroid to form a standard toroid coil. Basically we have formed a large scale magnetic toroid core with a coil. These tiny magnets are all aligned to form a closed loop-- essentially our core is saturated. Now at a constant rate randomly force say 100 PM's per second to flip. This will induce a net constant voltage. We know that the net constant voltage is not dependant on how fast _each_ PM flips. Rather the net constant voltage depends on _how many_ PM's _per second_ are flipped. So, the induction is relative to how many flipped PM's per second and MCE energy is relative to how fast a PM is flipped.
In other words, if each PM is flipped in 1 ms rather than 10 ms the net constant induced voltage will not change, but there will be more radiation energy. MCE is that radiation energy.
Note that each time a PM is flipped we'll see a dc pulse (a dc spike) in voltage. If the PM flips 1000 times fast, then the _net average_ voltage does not change; i.e., the voltage is 1000 times greater, but the pulse width is 1000 times shorter. So it flips 1000 times faster. The voltage will be 1000 times greater. If the voltage is 1000 times greater then power is 1000000 times greater-- P=V^2/R. Therefore, power is 1000000 times greater, the time is 1000 times less, the resulting energy is 1000 times greater. Energy = time * Voltage^2 / Resistance. If we were to look at this signal on a spectrum we would see that by increasing the flip 1000 times faster results in higher frequencies. If you flipped it fast enough you would have a high-energy gamma photon, and you better duck. ;-) E=hf

How to measure MCE
Image #1 below shows the circuit. Image #2 below shows the toroid, wires going through the toroids, and the thermistors. This experiments simply measures the MCE of the core. This will provide an indication of the cores potential for "free energy."
The circuit, Image #1, consists of two thermistors and an op-amp. The voltage across the thermistors is feed to the op-amp. I use negative thermistors, meaning the resistance decreases with an increase in temperature. One of the thermistors is used to measure the cores temperature, while the other thermistor is used to cancel out any room temperature changes.
Image #2 shows how the thermistors are connected to the core, by means of heat sync grease. I use thermistors that are unaffected by magnetic fields, but just in case they are slightly affect I separate the thermistors and core with heat sync grease. The wires are drawn as red and blue. The switch is seen in green. When the switch is in position A there is a net applied field in core #1. When the switch is in position B there is no net applied field in core #1. Note there will never be any net applied field in core #2 since the wire (red) goes inside the core, but then backtracks and leaves the core. The only purpose for this wire is to make sure the heat caused by the wires DC current is the same in both cores. Lets say the DC current in the wires is 1 A. So in core #2 there will always 2 units of heat caused by the wire. In core #1 there will also be 2 units of heat caused by the wire. The wires should never touch the cores. Try and place the wires directly in the center of the cores.
Here is the process. Turn the switch to position A. This causes a net applied field in core #1, which causes the core to heat up due to MCE. Such temperature changes will most likely take several minutes to reach peak as seen in the op-amps output. Eventually the core will cool down and reach equilibrium, room temperature. When this happens switch the position B. This will cause the core to cool below room temperature due to MCE. Note that immediately after you switch to position B you will need to degauss core #1. Image #2 does not show the degaussing wire and circuit, but there needs to be another wire through core #1, which is connected to circuit that will generate AC current. The initial AC current will be at peak, but will slowly dampen out in roughly a few seconds. This is how you degauss a magnetic core. I do not recommend a hand held degausser as this could cause the core to physically move, thereby heating up the core, and it may not completely degauss the closed loop field, rather just the traverse fields. The degaussing AC current has no DC, just AC. To be symmetric you will want to degauss both core #1 and #2. The below image, Degaussing field, demonstrates how the core is degaussed. The horizontal axis is the applied field caused by the wire. The vertical axis is the net field. By slowly decreasing the ac current we see the core is eventually degaussed. If the core had zero coercivity then there would be no need to degauss the core.
In Image #1 the POT (R10) is to balance your thermistors since no two thermistors are alike. You'll probably want to make R10 a large resistor in series with a large pot unless you have a pot with enough resistance. I drew the Thermistor (R5) as 98.7K merely as an example to demonstrate that two thermistors are not alike. R6 & R8 should be matched resistors or two adjusted pots since they need to be the same resistance. I find the old LM741 a good choice believe it or not because the 741 doesn't mind big capacitors. Surely there's always a better choice. The circuit drawing does not show the op-amp balance resistors. Op-amp pin 1 goes to one end of a 200 K pot, pin 5 goes to the other end of the 200 K pot, the center of the pot goes to a 200 K resistor, which goes to V+. If 200 K does not offer enough balance then try 100 K values.
The amount of DC current going through coils depends on the core material. One amp should be more than enough for a core with over 10,000 permeability. You could add yet another wire through core #1 to test the cores permeability. This wire would have ac current. This ac current must remain constant between permeability tests. You would measure the ac voltage across the core after it is degaussed and then compare that ac voltage to when the core is saturated. The voltage across the core when near saturation should be significantly lower as compared to when degaussed. Of course this is a one time permeability test just be certain you are indeed degaussing the core and also reaching near saturation levels. This permeability test is then removed during real tests.
Image #1: Image #2: Degaussing field: Relevant Posts at overunity.com http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1565.msg13373.html#msg13373 http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1569.0.html Kind regards, Paul Lowrance
Retrieved from "http://emwiki.info/MEMM"ViewsArticle Discussion View source History Personal toolsLog in / create account Guide
Main Page Wiki Basics Recent changes Random page Spotlight MEMM TEMM Hilden-Brand Magnet Motor Categories Category Top All categories Support Wiki Basics Sandbox Contact Search Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link

This page was last modified 00:01, 12 November 2006. This page has been accessed 232 times. Privacy policy About EMWiki Disclaimers ----------------------------------------------------- Leser von OU : Mannix
----------------------------------------iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii I want to tell you something important that may help you to understand what is going on inside the collector. You know what a particle accelerator is... Well you can accelerate electrons to past the speed of light and you know what happens? They disappear. Does that mean that there is no speed of light ? NO, it means that the electrons go out of this dimensional plane. Scientists are not prepared to explain anything beyond this point. Neither am I. However it has been hypothesized that IF the electrons did not leave our dimensional realm, and stayed here, they would rip the fabric of time and space, possibly destroying our universe as we know it. That means that the power released would be unbelievable and totally inconceivable to mankind. But never the less, it is fact.
My friend, listen. Think about, no, visualize the following: Imagine that you have a cannon which fires a projectile at a velocity of 1000 miles an hour. The amount of energy held in the moving projectile until converted is lets say a figure of ten. It will never become more then our figure of ten. The energy will slowly dissipate until the projectile slows and begins to fall to the ground and it's finale dissipation will occur when it strikes the earth or the object it was aimed at. Now, we have been told that there will never be more energy available from the projectile other then what was given to it when first fired into the sky, EXCEPT for the following example: Now, there can be a further dissipation of energy if the projectile was carrying a charge of dynamite to explode on impact as well. Do you see how the different things all relate here? Let me expand your mind for a moment.... Suppose that the projectile which you fired was another cannon? Now you have another cannon traveling at 1000 miles an hour... Now, if you could fire the second cannon, the projectile coming from it would be traveling at a velocity of 1000 miles an hour after being fired. However, since the cannon is already traveling at a speed of 1000 miles an hour when you fire it, the speed of the second fired projectile is essentially now 2000 miles per hour and the energy available to convert from the second projectile, is now twice the ten available from the first projectile! You now have energy availability of twenty to convert from the second projectile. Now, what if the projectile fired from the second cannon were another cannon and you fired it. Since the second cannon is traveling at 2000 miles per hour then the projectile you fire from it would make 3000 miles per hour, and so on and so on.... The energy released from the speed of multiple projectiles increases the energy available to be dissipated upon impact many fold! The faster the speed of ANYTHING the more energy will be available for conversion. A long time ago, i said, if you take a bullet and throw it at the side of an automobile;e it will bounce off. However, if you place the bullet into a gun and fire it at the automobile it, with sufficient velocity, go through the metal door and through the other side because of the inertia energy available for conversion. Speed is energy if you can convert the mass into energy quickly enough! Anything no matter how small can store enough energy to convert into huge amounts of energy. Even electrons..................................... Now, electrons can travel only so fast along the surface of the wire because of magnetic flux. what if you disable the effects of the flux? Now the electrons float freely without anything holding them back. electrons at the sped of light are now a possibility! How much energy can be converted from a stream of electrons traveling close to the speed of light? Remember the bullet story. Think of this: Energy conversion is different when you consider speed. 12 volts at 100 amps is slow and the energy can not dissipate quickly enough to kill you by discharge. But, it is a lot of energy especially if converted to speed. Reduce that 100 amps to 100 mA but increase the voltage (speed) to 100,000 volts and you can electrocute someone! My unit operates on these principles. Think about all those frequencies traveling inside the collector coil and how they interact.....

-----------------
-------------------------------------------- TPU (RAR-Format) http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6015476.html?s_id=bd144ba1ea594df1ebdbc9bbe1c0277c http://www.freepatentsonline.com/REF6015476?s_id=bd144ba1ea594df1ebdbc9bbe1c0277c http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6015476.pdf?s_id=bd144ba1ea594df1ebdbc9bbe1c0277c
Thats right Groundloop, there is no such patent for the real TPU but consider this...
Steve Mark or anybody else would never have been allowed to patent a 'free energy device'. If he tried it would have been hushed up on national security grounds or he would have gotten a lot of heat from the etablishment.
So what is fairly obvious, in order to protect intellectual property, they have taken the core elements of the TPU and patented it for another use/field. I am convinced the patent contains important elements of the TPU design and is worth looking at closely.
The trick is figuring out what is a part of the tpu and what is obfustication.
-------------------